Affirmative Action and OFCCP Law Advisor. A source of insights, news and strategy on affirmative action and EEO compliance matters. Published by Jackson Lewis P. Decision Issued on Obligation to Post Executive Order 13496 Notice of Labor Rights. In an update to our post more than a year ago. Posted in Case Law update.

A zero intent sample is a sample which will only satisfy our validation goal if no positive examples are found in it.

Calculating Overtime Value of Flat-Sum Bonus Must Be Based on Actual Non-Overtime Hours Worked, California High Court Holds. The California Supreme Court has held that, under state law, when an employee earns a flat sum bonus during a pay period, the overtime pay rate will be calculated using the actual number of non-overtime hours worked by the employee during the pay period.

1, Head Coach Responsibility, imposes a presumption of head coach accountability for impermissible acts committed by assistant coaches and administrators within their program. The penalties associated with Head Coach Responsibility violations are severe.

Walk the Compliance Walk in 2018. The New Year is prime time to take a look at your Code of Conduct and compliance policies both to consider whether you are up to date on all applicable requirements, but also so that you are fluent in your own processes and prepared to take. Do you clearly articulate a top-to-bottom commitment to achieving business goals and promoting a productive, positive culture? Future harassment.

FMLA And ADA Claims Put To Bed Where Employer Did Not Know Employee Had Sleep Apnea At The Time Her Employment Was Terminated. It seems axiomatic that a disability discrimination claim requires the plaintiff to suffer from a disability.

A federal court in New York dismissed all claims asserted by a recovering alcoholic under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act for numerous reasons including that he did not show he was disabled. State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs.

Multi-Million Dollar Nationwide Class Settlement Vacated by Ninth Circuit. In a major blow to multistate class actions, according to the dissenting opinion in Espinosa v. At a final approval hearing more than two years after the parties initially proposed the settlement, the district court gave its final approval for the class settlement over objections by parties who challenged the settlement.